Pilot/replication partners (2-5 municipalities/urban agencies) to apply the tool to real sites and provide feedback on usability and decision relevance. Practitioner validation from planners/engineers/consultants to test rankings against real constraints and local practices. Data & integration partners to connect with urban data/GIS and explore interoperability with platforms such as eVp. Capacity-building uptake via training/workshops for municipal staff. Research partners to evaluate performance, extend indicators, and publish results.

TRL 6: functional web prototype validated in euPOLIS pilot cities and available online. Next steps: productise and scale—calibrate indicators for more cities, improve interoperability with municipal GIS/urban data, explore GDPM integration, and package training. We seek public/private funding or investment for pilots, integration and go-to-market.

Yes this result is scalable.

1. Digital-by-design: It’s a web-based tool, so adding new users/sites mainly requires server capacity and onboarding, not proportional staffing.
2. Repeatable methodology: The contextual-indicator workflow is standardised and can be applied across many urban sites with readily available data, enabling replication across cities and countries.
3. Modular expansion: Indicator sets, NBS libraries, and reporting modules can be extended for new geographies, hazards, or policy priorities without redesigning the core tool.
4. Efficient delivery model: Subscription access plus training bundles supports scaling revenue while keeping unit costs low.
5. Integration potential: Interoperability with municipal GIS/urban data systems (and platforms like GDPM) can reduce deployment friction and support broader adoption.